🔗 Share this article

As any significant awards ceremony draws close, you'll find a clamor for the addition additional classifications to acknowledge underappreciated efforts and fill the hearts of followers who have specialized interests.

Another commentator made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are board games, which is someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward just as with other dedicated enthusiasts, I possess a compelling case for why my demand remains most pressing and important of all. The demand is this: We need a classification for brain-teasing titles.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and typically generate discussions concluding with vague boundaries. This explains why cinema institutions avoid this approach. But it is an unavoidable compromise in the world of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse they barely qualify as a single art form.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

The major gaming awards presently include award types recognizing Action, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these award types successfully include a lot of ground, making space possible for most games within them.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. No appropriate category exists to accommodate them. Consider three of outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: structural challenges from a specific release, intense tile-matching of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. What category would fit them within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

Recognition Challenges

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers published annually lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.

• A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated in any category in 2014
• A different innovative game received no nominations during that ceremony
• Popular arranging title received no acknowledgment in 2021
• Only a few brain-teasers scraped into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're modest productions, however the design behind logic titles carries substantial weight. Famous handheld logic titles count as the most-played games in the world maintaining this status for many years.

The famous puzzle experience competes with well-known building titles claiming status as most purchased experience; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Puzzle games are foundational within interactive entertainment, and engaging with almost every other genre.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. One could readily select multiple candidates engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these represent titles that otherwise have no home during prominent ceremonies. Brain-teaser creators function at the challenging frontier of video game design, producing among essential manifestations of gaming itself. Comparable to movie stunt professionals, they warrant appreciation. We shouldn't delay decades.