🔗 Share this article

In her latest publication, named We the People, the writer makes an extensive 600-page argument for the US constitution as a evolving text, created to be updated with each generation.

A Profound Historical Critique of Originalist Theory

Lepore explains how her book is also “a deep historical criticism of the originalist approach,” that right-leaning judicial doctrine that presently dominates the highest court. She argues how deep political polarization has rendered constitutional amendments virtually politically unachievable.

Within proponents of originalism, only the views of those that drafted the document in Philadelphia in 1787 ought to be used to divine constitutional intent, even centuries afterward in a nation of cars, planes, automatic weapons, artificial intelligence, entitlements granted to females and marginalized groups—issues the framers did not foresee.

For Lepore, as to many scholars, that is plainly illogical.

“Originalism represents a peculiar category that holds many variations,” she stated. “But among the more reductive versions of originalism is the insistence that this is how the constitution was drafted and was meant to be read from the very beginning.”

Historical Background and Confidentiality

The author points out how the framer’s records from that historic gathering weren't released till 1840, years after his death. She explains how participants took an unofficial 50-year pledge of silence, meaning they weren't supposed to reveal what happened at the proceedings because such information was not intended to matter constitutional interpretation.

Likewise, those ratifying assembly discussions are not especially definitive, and the essays—written by Madison, Hamilton, and Jay—had been printed mainly within NY publications and were not widely read outside that region. They were rarely referenced within the supreme court over a significant period.

Contradiction and within the Conservative Group

The historian points out an interesting small yet potent contradiction: In 1982, right-wing individuals established the Federalist Society, which evolved into a driving force of originalist ideology. As their emblem, the group selected the framer’s silhouette. However, deeming Madison’s real facial feature displeasing, members amended the image to give Madison a nicer nose.

“I really aimed to put that detail in there,” Lepore stated, laughing. “It’s a amusing detail which points to a certain adaptability within a movement that professes to prioritize historical accuracy.”

Exploring the Amendments Project

The professor also details her work on a constitutional database, which offers a searchable collection containing every effort to amend the US constitution. Since only 27 amendments have ever been ratified, she views this as more than an archive of unsuccessful attempts but as a study of possibility.

Lepore emphasizes that young people lack a sense regarding civic possibility, and studying even unsuccessful amendments can be energizing and informative.

Historical Personalities and Their Battles

In the volume, the author highlights overlooked American individuals that campaigned to achieve constitutional change. These are John Jones along with his spouse, Mary Richardson Jones, both of whom are prominent in the African American political gathering efforts across Chicago.

Lepore suggests that concentrating on such figures—rather than just famous leaders such as Douglass—helps audiences more easily envision themselves taking part in political change.

An Living Document Made from the Past

Lepore concludes with reinforcing the vision of America's charter as a living entity—one created from “historical records and natural materials… sheepskin together with goose feathers” yet still fully alive and able of evolve.

Lepore voices optimism believing this document might still “come to life” via future generations who continue to participate with its amendment mechanism.